Tim Cook

It’s time for our yearly review Apple’s efficiency throughout the previous year, as translucented the eyes of authors, editors, programmers, podcasters, and also other individuals that invest a dreadful great deal of time thinking of Apple.

This is the 5th year that I have actually offered this study to a hand-selected team. They were motivated with 12 various Apple-related topics, and also asked to rank them on a range from 1 to 5 and also additionally offer message discourse per classification. I obtained 65 responds, with the ordinary outcomes as revealed listed below:

Considering that I utilized mostly the exact same study as in previous years, I had the ability to track the modification in my panel’s agreement point of view on almost one inquiry contrasted to previous years. The internet modifications in between 2018 and also 2019 studies is shown listed below:

Keep reading for category-by-category qualities, patterns, and also discourse from the panelists.

The Mac

Quality: B (ordinary rating: 3.6, mean rating 4, in 2014: B-)

The Mac’s rating increased over in 2014, and also you would certainly assume that our panel would certainly have offered Apple credit report for presenting the 16- inch MacBook Pro with a scissor-switch key-board. However its appreciation for that relocation was combined with a lot of booking and also a feeling that the task’s much from done.

Charles Perry claimed, “Apple really rescued their 2019 with the release of the new 16-inch MacBook Pro.” David Stimulates claimed, “I’m so happy to see a new more reliable keyboard making its way into the line with the new MacBook Pro.”

Carolina Milanesi claimed, “They need to have arranged [the keyboard] out faster as well as likewise need to have been much more clear regarding the concern.” Christina Warren claimed, “This [keyboard] is a black mark Apple will certainly not have the ability to quickly get rid of.” John Siracusa claimed, “We can no longer take the longterm reliability of Apple’s laptop hardware for granted.”

Shahid Kamal Ahmad claimed, “My happiness at Apple appearing to listen to its customers was tempered by a feeling that all they’d done was lifted their boots from our faces.” John Moltz claimed, “You shouldn’t get much credit simply for fixing your long-term mistakes.” Andrew Laurence claimed, “It took far too long to fix the polarizing disaster of the butterfly keyboard.”

Dr. Drang claimed, “It was a painful detour. I was a decidedly Mac-first person but could not bring myself to buy a new Mac laptop and began testing iPads as my most-used computer.”

John Gruber claimed, “None of the other MacBooks have that keyboard… if you buy a MacBook Air today — the best-selling, most-popular MacBook — you are not getting a good keyboard.”

After guaranteeing it in 2017, Apple delivered its brand new Mac Pro late in 2019, and also some participants of the panel offered the firm credit report for that, while others really felt that it was a misfire.

John Siracusa claimed, “The Mac Pro is a bright spot in Apple’s 2019: a long-expected party for high-end Mac users. Apple has listened to its customers that can always use more power and expandability—and are willing to pay for it.” Adam Engst claimed, “The Mac Pro’s industrial design is another example of how Apple can listen to its customers when it wants to.”

Paul Kafasis claimed, “I know I’m not alone in wishing that Apple would bring back a Power Mac style desktop, with higher end components and expandability, but a more reasonable price in the $2500-$5000 range…. neglecting the ‘middle class’ is at the very least a missed opportunity.”

After that there was macOS Catalina and also various other innovations presented at Apple’s 2019 programmer seminar, which were met a great deal of uncertainty.

Marco Arment claimed, “The hardware is much better than the software.” Rob Griffiths claimed, “I think the new hardware has been really good… Catalina, on the other hand, is a mess.”

Charles Arthur claimed, “Catalina and Catalyst are really uninspiring.” Steven Troughton-Smith claimed, “Apple fumbled the start of their next major platform transition with Catalyst and SwiftUI with a poorly documented, barely-ready rushed debut for both technologies.” Stephen Hackett claimed, “Apple needs to be clearer about what it thinks the future of Mac applications should be. Mac Catalyst and SwiftUI feel like they were on separate, parallel and secret paths within the company, just to end up crossing the line into the public at the same time at WWDC 2019.”

Glenn Fleishman claimed, “Catalina was a disastrous release.” John Siracusa claimed, “Apple has not done a good job communicating the benefits of Catalina, an update that… comes with more pitfalls than the average macOS update.” Joe Kissell claimed, “Catalina was, and continues to be, a real downer in terms of missing features, bugs, and overall quality.” Andrew Laurence claimed, “For the first time in my career, this IT professional warns users away from the new macOS, and took action to prevent users from installing it.”

Catalina’s customized technique to safety and security especially came under attack.

Stephen Hackett claimed, “I can’t help but worry about Apple’s on-going tightening of the screws when it comes to macOS and the apps that run atop my OS of choice.” Benjamin Mayo claimed, “Catalina’s privacy features were not fully designed and make for a pretty terrible first boot experience on updating to the new OS.”

John Gruber claimed, “Catalina clearly bends too far in the direction of security. By design, it’s just too inconvenient… why in the world is the desktop treated as some sort of sensitive location?… There should be a single switch for expert users to toggle to effectively say ‘I trust all of the software on my Mac.’… I don’t know a single expert Mac user who is not seriously annoyed by the heavy-handed security design of Catalina… I genuinely fear for the future of the Mac as a platform for serious computer users…. Not one thing about Mac software got better in 2019 and everything that did change made it worse.”

The apple iphone

Quality: A- (ordinary rating: 4.0, mean rating 4, in 2014: B+)

It’s great to be the king, and also Apple’s apple iphone 11 equipment maintained it riding high.

Abundant Mogull claimed, “The new models are home runs.” Dave Hamilton claimed, “Deep Fusion and Night Mode are truly fantastic, almost overlooked, features.” Federico Viticci claimed,” the apple iphone 11 Pro video camera has actually made me fall for taking images on my apple iphone around once more.” Shahid Kamal Ahmad claimed, “The latest model does everything with the swagger of a Bentley GT.”

Marco Arment claimed, “iPhone hardware has never been better…. The iPhone 11 camera system isn’t just a great phone camera — it’s a great camera, period.” John Gruber claimed, “I love all the iPhone 11 models. I’ve been an avid hobbyist photographer for 20 years and I happily shoot over 95 percent of my photos using my iPhone.” Shawn Blanc claimed, “I think that they are making the right choices about what to incorporate and what to focus on: Battery life! Cameras!”

Carolina Milanesi claimed, “The strongest portfolio yet… I particularly liked iPhone 11 being their mass market option, aimed at younger users as well as more price-conscious ones.” Casey Liss claimed, “I cannot overstate how impressed I am by this camera.” John Siracusa claimed, “The iPhone is always good, but these are great.”

Currently the problem: iphone 13’s hard roll-out took some the luster off of the apple iphone.

Glenn Fleishman called iphone 13 “a minor disaster.” Dan Provost called it “shockingly buggy.” Paul Kafasis mentioned an “incredibly sloppy, bug-filled roll-out.” Benjamin Mayo called it “a big fumble.” Dr. Drang called it “an embarrassment.” Sean Heber claimed, “I don’t think I’ve ever had to reboot my phone as often as I have this year.”

Stephen Hackett claimed, “I’m not sure what lessons Apple needs to learn over the release, but I hope that we won’t see another cycle like this one.” Casey Liss claimed, “As an engineer, this smells a lot like marketing and/or management not listening to the rank-and-file engineers asking to take a breath.”

Charles Arthur claimed, “The software has been an utter goatf—. Quite how Apple went from the stability of iOS 12 to the mess of iOS 13 should be a business study, if only someone would tell us about how it happened.”

( There’s far more on iphone 13 in the Software program Dependability area, listed below.)

Lastly, numerous panelists stated the concept that Apple requires to include a smaller sized phone to its profile. Philip Michaels claimed, “If Apple comes out with an iPhone SE successor in the next year, all will be well.” Adam Engst claimed, “Maybe we need to start mocking Apple’s designers as being incapable of designing a top-notch iPhone in an iPhone SE form factor.” As well as Paul Kafasis whined regarding “the continued lack of a smaller-sized top-of-the-line phones.”

The iPad

Quality: B+ (ordinary rating: 3.9, mean rating 4, in 2014: A-)

The panelists allowed followers of the spread of Apple’s iPad equipment offerings, however (similar to the apple iphone) that excitement was polluted by concerns with iPad software application.

Josh Centers claimed, “The base-model iPad is a fantastic value, especially now that it supports both the Apple Pencil and Smart Keyboard.” Kirk McElhearn claimed, “The iPad has a full range of options for everyone.” Shahid Kamal Ahmad claimed, “I was pleasantly surprised by the iPad mini 5… It’s light, fast, smooth and always available.”

Devindra Hardawar claimed, “The new iPad is a tremendous deal, it’s getting to a point where every gadget geek should own one.” Adam C. Engst claimed, “The iPad was the one place where Apple has managed to introduce hardware that offers entirely reasonable specs and keep the price low.”

However John Siracusa desired much more: “I’m ready for an OLED screen,” he claimed.

In 2019 Apple chose to call the variation of iphone operating on the iPad “iPadOS,” which obtained appreciation from some panelists.

Casey Liss claimed, “iPadOS is definitely a step in the right direction.” David Stimulates claimed, “We just need Apple to keep the gas down on iPadOS improvements.” Federico Viticci claimed, “Time will tell whether having a separate iPadOS will pay off for iPad aficionados craving annual updates to the tablet’s OS.” Lory Gil claimed, “iPadOS made 2019 the year of the iPad.”

Steve Troughton-Smith claimed, “It was so good to finally see some big ticket items that had been missing — like multiple windows, external storage support, a download manager, contextual menus, and even mouse support.”

However there were a great deal of difficult words for the existing state of the iPad software application experience.

Dr. Drang claimed, “Despite years of urging from iPad users, Apple still doesn’t seem to understand how much we want to do ‘real computer things’ on this device.”

Lex Friedman claimed, “iPadOS still feels hacked together.” Michael E. Cohen claimed, “The new multi-tasking iPadOS features are welcome but seem clumsily implemented.” Dan Moren claimed, “The more I use it, the more I find the spots that really don’t work for me, chief among them the lackluster multitasking support.”

Benjamin Mayo claimed, “My expectations for iPadOS were high… and I don’t think Apple quite met the hype. I fear it will be another two years before we see more changes in this department.” Alex Cox claimed, “The iPad hardware continues to blow me away, but the software is still disappointing.”

Aleen Simms claimed, “Swipe gestures on iPadOS are still baffling to me. They’re undiscoverable and not intuitive.” John Moltz claimed, “Multitasking is still a mess.” Marco Arment claimed, “Multitasking remains unintuitive.”

John Gruber claimed, “To say that I’m not a fan of iPadOS is an understatement… Getting the split-screen and Slide Over stuff to work is utterly unintuitive… It’s madness. I’m glad Apple started branding iOS and iPadOS separately. One of them is very cohesive, the other is incoherent.”

Federico Viticci claimed, “There’s still plenty left to address – from refinements to multiwindow and the Files app to bigger questions that are looming large over the iPad’s role in Apple’s ecosystem. Will the iPad continue to be ‘just a tablet’ with an optional keyboard in its second decade? Will we see Apple move toward a more hybrid approach with features inspired by and modeled after laptops? Something else entirely?”

Carolina Milanesi claimed, “I think the new iPad Pro models are held back by how basic the keyboard is compared to the Surface keyboard.”

Apple Watch/ Wearables

Apple Watch: Quality: A- (ordinary rating: 4.1, mean rating 4, in 2014: A)

Wearables: Quality: A+ (ordinary rating: 4.6, mean rating 5)

( Considering that I such as to keep connection in between years, I remained to ask the panelists to rank the Apple Watch. However because Apple currently has a tendency to discuss Wearables as a classification– consisting of both Apple Watch and also AirPods– I have actually determined to likewise inquire about Wearables. This will certainly permit me to contrast the panelists’ sights on wearables starting with following year’s study.)

Panelists were virtually completely favorable regarding Apple’s efficiency in this classification.

Charles Arthur claimed, “In wearables, Apple has really got everything working just right: it’s really firing on all cylinders, with the timing just right and the updates nicely chosen.” Federico Viticci claimed, “Apple has only cemented its role as the leader in the wearable revolution.”

AirPods came in for virtually global appreciation. John Siracusa claimed, “AirPods are now officially a phenomenon.” Josh Centers claimed, “I think it’s impressive that Apple is selling out of $250 wireless earbuds.” Dan Moren claimed “AirPods Pro is… the closest for me that a recent Apple product has come to capturing that indefinable ‘magic.’” Steven Aquino claimed, “AirPods Pro are without a doubt my favorite Apple product of the year.” Peter Cohen called them “lightning in a bottle.” Jim Dalrymple claimed they were “the best thing to come out of Apple in a while.” Marco Arment called them “fantastic, with a better fit for many people (like me) who AirPods didn’t fit.”

Gabe Weatherhead claimed, “AirPods Pro is a device that redefines my expectations.” CGP Grey called them “a masterful product that, with its transparency mode, made me feel like I had the first taste of augmented reality from an unexpected place.”

Christina Warren claimed, “AirPods Pro are an incredible upgrade in almost every single way and are a great example of quintessential Apple refinement…. Apple is at its best with its wearables.” John Gruber claimed they were his “favorite headphones ever.”

However Rich Mogull supplied a little bit of cautioning with his appreciation: “I upgraded to the Pros and they are exceptional…. The only downside is the limited battery lifespan and replacement options. This is a long-term problem for Apple.”

The Apple Watch likewise was commonly commended, as you could anticipate.

Lex Friedman claimed, “I love the Apple Watch Series 5 so much. My favorite feature is the time. It tells me the time, all the time.” Paul Kafasis claimed, “I’m not sure what more to ask for when it comes to the Watch hardware.” Dan Provost claimed, “The significance of the always-on display cannot be overstated.”

Stephen Hackett claimed, “The always-on display on the Series 5 has brought me back. It fundamentally changed the way I think about the Apple Watch, for the better.” Charles Arthur claimed, “The new watch is terrific… The Watch has reached a solid plateau where it’s hard to figure out what else is needed.” Benjamin Mayo claimed, “Always-on is essentially playing the Joker. That feature alone was enough to make the Series 5 a solid product.” John Siracusa claimed, “The always-on Apple Watch screen is the next big leap for the product.”

Carolina Milanesi claimed, “Apple owns the smartwatch category… Apple Watch is no accessory.”

Zac Hall claimed, “Also important: Apple Watch Series 3 remained in the lineup from $199, matching the price of less impressive Fitbits.”

Still, there were a couple of concerns.

Casey Liss claimed, “As the owner of a 40mm Series 5, I can say that the battery life is… lacking.” Marco Arment claimed, “watchOS continues to be fine, but not great.”

CGP Grey claimed, “Let’s not even talk about watch faces: five years on and nothing really actionable is being done with all the health data it has.”

As well as Steve Troughton-Smith claimed, “Apple made it clear that SwiftUI is the only future of watchOS apps, so the developer platform is dead to me.”


Quality: D+ (ordinary rating: 2.7, mean rating 3, in 2014: D+)

For my cash, there’s no sadder quality than the D+. The Apple TELEVISION has actually been staying in D+ land for a number of years, and also our panelists located extremely little to obtain thrilled around.

Sean Heber claimed, “I feel like Apple TV is just coasting.” Brett Terpstra claimed, “Most of the software updates seemed like lateral moves.” Lory Gil claimed, “It’s still a hobby to Apple, even though it’s much more important to me.” Adam Engst claimed, “Talk about an ignored technology.”

Steve Troughton-Smith claimed, “This year was the first time the TV app was brought to my country, in preparation for Apple TV+, but what a horrendous user experience it is. The TV app on tvOS, now the default homescreen, feels like a minefield.” Gabe Weatherhead claimed, “I watch all TV through an Apple TV and I hate it. It’s my most used terrible device.”

Marco Arment claimed, “The TV app changed, but is still an unintuitive, buggy mess designed like a magazine instead of usable software, fitting in nicely with the rest of tvOS.” Abundant Mogull claimed, “The Apple TV app itself really needs a usability overhaul.”

Zac Hall claimed, “tvOS’s long-requested multi-user feature might as well not have shipped.”

Carolina Milanesi claimed, “It feels like people forgot about Apple TV as a hardware play and it’s really more about an Apple TV experience through different devices and apps on TV sets.” Casey Liss claimed, “I’m wondering what place the AppleTV has in my in-home device lineup…. So much of what the AppleTV does, my new TV can do natively.”

Benjamin Mayo claimed, “Apple TV hardware is too expensive for what it offers in 2019… The tvOS experience is better than competing streaming sticks, but nothing is worth a 4-5x price premium.” Christina Warren claimed, “The competition has not just caught up to Apple, it has surpassed it.”

A pair panelists assumed Apple TELEVISION’s individual experience evoked a various firm with a distinctly various collection of top priorities. Josh Centers claimed, “The Apple TV app feels like something Amazon would have shipped, catering to the needs and tastes of Apple instead of the user.” Rob Griffiths claimed, “More and more, they feel like Amazon devices, as they’re interested in getting you to sign up for their services.”

Lastly, CGP Grey claimed, “The jellyfish screensavers are a living nightmare.”


Quality: B (ordinary rating: 3.7, mean rating 4, in 2014: C+)

2019 truly was the year of Solutions, with Apple releasing numerous brand-new ones. Peter Cohen claimed, “It’s hard to imagine a more impactful year for Apple Services than 2019.”

Regardless of a quite consistent disapproval of Apple Information+, the panel significantly increased the Solutions quality. Complete credit report to Apple TELEVISION+ and also Apple Game, I mean, along with a basic sensation that iCloud is even more secure than it utilized to be.

Carolina Milanesi claimed, “the weakest link in the services portfolio is News+.” Glenn Fleishman called it “a damp squib.” Josh Centers called it “a dud in every possible way.” Allison Sheridan called it “bit of a yawn.”

Rob Griffiths claimed, “Apple News+ took the best magazine app reader out there and just destroyed it.” Benjamin Mayo claimed, “The News+ UI is still cack-handed… the News+ content offering is uninspiring.” Zac Hall claimed, “Apple News+ needs a major year-two upgrade. Despite tons of minor improvements, it’s just not a good deal for anyone.”

Apple TELEVISION+ responses were blended. Paul Kafasis claimed the “foray into original content is needless.” Devindra Hardawar claimed, “Apple TV+ is off to a rough start, but it’s nice to see that Apple is actually committed to original content.” Philip Michaels claimed, “I wouldn’t watch any of these Apple TV Plus shows if the actors came to my house and acted them out in my kitchen.”

Steve Troughton-Smith claimed, “I’m all for Apple’s push into better services, and have really enjoyed Apple TV+’s launch lineup.” John Siracusa claimed, “Apple TV+ is the surprise of the year. It’s flagship shows are all good, with definite moments of greatness.” Benjamin Mayo claimed, “I think Apple TV+ had the strongest content debut that anyone could reasonably hope for.” John Gruber claimed, “They mainly accomplished … the [one free year] promo is simply what the medical professional bought for a brand-new solution with a really minimal collection of web content.”

James Thomson claimed, “Apple Arcade is an aggressively-priced service with significantly more good games on it than I have time to play.” Benjamin Mayo claimed, “Apple Arcade is the opposite of News+, strong content with a solid 1.0 interface.” Josh Centers claimed, “Apple Arcade is probably the best of Apple’s new services, and the price is good, but the selection is still pretty limited.” Federico Viticci claimed, “Now they need to keep up the pace and show us why we should continue to pay for new games each month.”

Apple Card obtained a number of rather favorable discusses. Dan Moren claimed, “Apple Card has been…fine. Not as revolutionary as could have been hoped, but also about what was expected.” John Gruber claimed, “I’m still wary of Apple entering the credit card business, period, but I use my Apple Card for all Apple Pay purchases.”

As well as the panel is still grumbling regarding a “feature” of iCloud that has actually been about much longer than this study: the totally free 5GB of iCloud storage space per Apple ID. Charles Arthur claimed, “We’re coming close to a whole YEARS where [5GB] has actually been the base quantity, and also it’s crazy.” Casey Liss claimed, “iCloud storage tiers and pricing are still insulting.” Roman Loyola claimed, “C’mon Apple, you can do better than a free 5GB.”

Joe Kissell claimed, “iCloud’s free tier is still limited to a ridiculous 5GB of storage, and iCloud Drive folder sharing—something I could really use—has been delayed twice.” Michael Tsai claimed, “iCloud Drive did not deliver the promised new features.”

However a minimum of there’s this: Dr. Drang claimed, “iCloud Drive has become as reliable as Dropbox, so I will not be resubscribing to Dropbox.”


Quality: C- (ordinary rating: 2.8, mean rating 3, in 2014: C-)

A C-minus quality is much better than a D-plus, I mean, however it shows the panel’s general absence of excitement for Apple’s general smart-home initiatives.

Steven Troughton-Smith claimed, “Apple’s Home efforts seem to be coasting.” Charles Arthur claimed, “HomeKit seems like an utter backwater.” Abundant Mogull claimed, “HomeKit is still… meh.”

Shawn Blanc claimed, “Apple is so far behind in this category — it’s very frustrating.” John Gruber claimed, “If you haven’t even really looked into it yet, I’d say you’re not missing much.” Allison Sheridan claimed, “I want to love HomeKit, I truly do. But in my mind it’s not only not progressing, it’s slipping.”

Carolina Milanesi claimed, “I am still astonished just how much Apple is battling to establish Siri right into a system and also in 2019 it seemed like they have actually surrendered entirely “

Marco Arment claimed, “The Home app is still an over-designed, form-over-function, unintuitive mess.” Gabe Weatherhead claimed, “I’m still baffled by the Home app.” Federico Viticci claimed, “The Home app continues to be affected by an awful design that makes it way more difficult than it should be to quickly manage your accessories and see the status of your home at a glance.”

Stephen Hackett claimed, “HomeKit continues to move at a glacial pace… I tried HomeKit Secure Video, and it’s nowhere near ready.”

Nonetheless, Josh Centers mentioned Apple’s relocate to construct a brand-new smart-home criterion with Google and also Amazon.com as a favorable: “These developments are promising for the entire field, and I’m cautiously optimistic.”

Equipment Dependability

Quality: B+ (ordinary rating: 3.9, mean rating 4, in 2014: B+)

Apple typically remains to obtain great marks for equipment integrity, though that butterfly key-board …

Dan Provost claimed, “Continue to be overall best in class. Point deducted for continuing to sell butterfly keyboards.” Christina Warren claimed, “The keyboard decisions for the MacBook Pro will continue to haunt Apple for many years to come.”

Steven Troughton-Smith claimed, “With the Mac keyboard issues addressed properly, I hope things are going to trend up.” John Siracusa claimed, “Sorry, Apple, but the butterfly keyboard reigned for 2019 (and continues to be sold today).”

Stephen Hackett claimed, “2020 better be the end of the butterfly keyboard.” Casey Liss claimed, “Butterfly keyboards excepted, things seem to be pretty good.”

James Thomson claimed, “The slow death of the butterfly keyboard should mean by 2021 we won’t be talking about keyboard problems any more.” Alex Cox claimed, “There are still going to be butterflies flying around for far too long.” Andrew Laurence claimed, “The butterfly keyboard drags this entire category.”

Software program high quality

Quality: D+ (ordinary rating: 2.7, mean rating 3, in 2014: B-)

This classification took an awful swing– equally as it did in between 2016 and also2017 Is this what is suggested by a tick-tock advancement cycle? One year you rage any person, the following year you apologize. Nevertheless, the iphone 13 and also macOS Catalina launch cycles … were disliked by the panel. If this study determines basic view, the basic view is that Apple requires to reverse its smacking software application procedure in 2020.

CGP Grey claimed, “It’s been a brutally buggy year.” Sean Heber claimed, “It’s bad across the board.” Rene Ritchie claimed, “iOS 12 should be the new normal.” Andrew Laurence called it “the roughest year for new releases in quite a while.”

Lory Gil claimed, “This year shows an example of how its better to ship late and ship right than to ship on time with the risk of a poor user experience.” John Siracusa claimed, “The iOS 13 launch was the roughest in recent memory, and Catalina has not been smooth either. Apple needs to regroup on software quality.” Michael Tsai claimed, “Catalina is the worst macOS release I can remember… Catalyst has not delivered on its promise of either quality or quantity of apps.”

Paul Kafasis claimed, “Ooof – the fall of 2019 was a very, very rough year for Apple’s software. I truly wish they’d slow down the pace of their OS updates.” James Thomson claimed, “Something failed significantly in Apple’s software engineering process this year, and I hope lessons have been learned.”

Casey Liss claimed, “Without question, Apple is having trouble walking and chewing gum at the same time… So much of Apple seems to be defined by marketing rather than by engineering. If I were on the engineering team, I’d want to pump the brakes, and do so with all my might.”

Dr. Drang claimed, “I keep thinking Apple has overlearned the lesson of ‘The Mythical Man-Month’ and refuses to hire enough programmers to keep up with the demands of its enormous software base. From the outside, it looks as if the Apple software team just keeps running from fire to fire, an understaffed group barely able to take a breath between crises.”

Steve Troughton-Smith claimed, “This was a rough year as a developer trying to build things on Apple’s platforms… Every year, half-working features are layered on top of half-working foundations. Apple seems to be trying to do more than ever before, but it’s just not hitting the mark in so many areas.”

Designer connections

Quality: B- (ordinary rating: 3.4, mean rating 3, in 2014: B-)

Apple’s partnership with its application programmers was rough the year this study released. It’s boosted in the years because, however there are still a lot of concerns to exercise.

Steve Troughton-Smith claimed, “I would welcome stricter regulations from governing bodies, as there have been far too many instances where Apple has killed/rejected apps, or categories of apps, for entirely selfish or emotional reasons, or acquired app developers then integrating their apps into the OS with features and APIs that third party developers aren’t allowed access and thus can never compete with…. I think Apple is overreaching way beyond its remit.”

Casey Liss claimed, “Apple’s documentation is insultingly bad and/or non-existent. If Apple wants third party developers like myself to embrace new technologies, the answer can’t be ‘watch a WWDC video then get out a divining rod and hope for the best.’ They need to provide documentation for all of these new APIs. No excuses.”

Paul Kafasis claimed, “Registration [of macOS apps] has actually so far functioned much better than I could have anticipated … As long as Apple utilizes a really, extremely light touch with this, it can be a win for customers and also programmers. However, I reside in concern of a picky use this to eliminate something legit that Apple just disapproval.”

Environmental/Social/Societal effect

Quality: C+ (ordinary rating: 3.3, mean rating 3, in 2014: B-)

This is a strange classification, because what it’s truly around has actually transformed a whole lot over 4 studies. Back in 2015, the classification was mainly regarding the working problems in Apple’s Chinese manufacturing facilities. It’s likewise had to do with Apple’s personal privacy position, its assistance for eco-friendly power, and also the recyclability of its items. This year, it appears to have actually ended up being (a minimum of partly) regarding Donald Trump’s look along with Tim Chef at a Texas plant that sets up the Mac Pro, and also regarding Apple eliminating an application from the Application Shop that was being utilized by Hong Kong militants– in addition to even more wide problems regarding Apple’s option to approve the judgments of tyrannical routines in China and also Russia.

It interests keep in mind that Apple’s rating in this classification has actually decreased each and every single year the study has actually been taken. This classification can be a vacant vessel right into which the panelists can put their view regarding whether Apple is meeting its very own soaring suitables as a firm. It’s constantly interesting to see what bubbles to the surface area annually.

Casey Liss claimed, “I was disgusted by Tim Cook’s recent dog and pony show with Trump. The amount of kowtowing that was done is incongruous with Apple’s and Tim’s stance on social and environmental issues.”
Carolina Milanesi claimed, “I really expect more from Tim Cook than letting himself be manipulated into an election campaign photo moment.”

Stephen Hackett claimed, “I think Tim Cook’s proximity to the Trump Administration is hurtful to many at Apple and in the wider community. The White House is at odds with so many of the values Cook talks about and uses to shape Apple’s impact in the world.” Alex Cox claimed, “Tim Apple needs to stop humoring Donald Trump.”

Philip Michaels claimed, “I hope Tim Cook likes being featured in Donald Trump re-election ads, because footage of him standing next to Trump in an Apple factory heaping praise on the economy is going to get replayed roughly a billion times between now and November. Cozying up to an authoritarian just so you could get some tariff exceptions washes out the positives you hope to gain by using recycled materials in your hardware.”

John Gruber claimed, “It’s an absolute disgrace that Apple allowed Donald Trump to use the Mac Pro assembly plant in Austin as the backdrop for an event to promote his re-election. Trump is a liar, a crook, and his administration has proven to be a menace to everything Apple stands for: LGBT and racial equality, the environment, and privacy as a human right.”

Marco Arment claimed, “Apple’s core environmental and political ideologies remain better than most corporations, but cooperation with the Chinese government and the Trump propaganda campaign has tarnished their reputation.” Christina Warren claimed, “I was personally disappointed by Apple’s decisions to bow to China a few times this year, especially in regards to the Hong Kong protests.”

James Thomson claimed, “Apple’s reliance on authoritarian and corrupt governments has led to a number of highly questionable choices. Their continued focus on user privacy should still be commended.”

Glenn Fleishman claimed, “Apple was moving strongly forward on privacy, human rights, and democracy, and then it appears to be giving China everything it wants even as China builds a total surveillance state at a level people in the NSA and FBI only dream of. I’d like Apple in 2020 to figure out a plan for China, even if it means exiting the entire market. Tim Cook should not be able to sleep at night while empowering a totalitarian state as it perfects permanent, total citizen control.”

John Moltz claimed, “it was sickening to see the company attempt to continue to project its independent, customer-focused image using quotes from Martin Luther King, Jr. and a homepage marking the fall of the Berlin Wall while it removed an app that helped people in Hong Kong continue their protests in the face of a crackdown on their human rights.”

Abundant Mogull claimed, “Their position on China in particular is undermining their own support for human rights. This is something that can’t be ignored anymore…. But when you focus on human rights as a core value that should mean human rights everywhere. This is where Apple’s business needs are in conflict with their social stances.”

Steve Troughton-Smith claimed, “Apple is struggling to navigate the global political landscape whilst doing the right thing… That shouldn’t take away from all the good they have done for accessibility, green energy and recycling — but it is something that rubbed me up the wrong way this year”

Josh Centers claimed, “If Apple really cared about the environment, you could replace the battery in the AirPods.”

Our panel likewise had ideas regarding Apple’s accept of ease of access and also proceeded efforts to enhance its variety and also incorporation.

Steven Aquino claimed, “In terms of accessibility, Apple continues to push forward, both product-wise and in general advocacy. The introduction of ‘See’ is at the forefront of this—it is very much representative of the company’s institutional love for accessibility and the disabled community. Whatever one thinks of the show’s entertainment value, there can be no denying how revolutionary ‘See’ is in terms of disability representation in Hollywood. It is a very big deal.”

Carolina Milanesi claimed, “I think accessibility remains a strong point for Apple. Diversity and inclusion is another area where I would like to see more rapid progress, especially in senior roles.” Aleen Simms claimed, “Apple is, as always, stellar at accessibility. Voice Control, introduced with iOS 13, enables people with disabilities to do more than ever before. I’m still not impressed with their diversity and inclusion statistics.”

Jean MacDonald claimed, “I’m glad to see Apple promoting its second year of Entrepreneur Camp for companies with women founders, CEOs, and lead developers.”


I really did not enact the study. Panelists that reacted to the study consisted of Shahid Kamal Ahmad, Steven Aquino, Marco Arment, Charles Arthur, Shawn Blanc, Jeff Carlson, Robert Carter, Josh Centers, Peter Cohen, Michael E. Cohen, Alex Cox, Jim Dalrymple, Jessica Dennis, Dr. Drang, Adam Engst, Glenn Fleishman, Lex Friedman, Lory Gil, CGP Grey, Rob Griffiths, John Gruber, Stephen Hackett, Zac Hall, Dave Hamilton, Devindra Hardawar, Sean Heber, Nick Heer, Myke Hurley, Paul Kafasis, Joe Kissell, Andrew Laurence, Casey Liss, Ben Long, Roman Loyola, Jean MacDonald, Benjamin Mayo, Kirk McElhearn, Philip Michaels, Carolina Milanesi, Rich Mogull, John Moltz, Dan Moren, Rosemary Orchard, Charles Perry, Dan Provost, Ant Pruitt, Gui Rambo, Rene Ritchie, Allison Sheridan, Rich Siegel, Brent Simmons, Aleen Simms, John Siracusa, David Stimulates, Brett Terpstra, James Thomson, Steve Troughton-Smith, Michael Tsai, Khoi Vinh, Federico Viticci, Christina Warren, Gabe Weatherhead, Jeffrey Zeldman. (Some panelists favored that their involvement be confidential.)

I really did not permit panelists to be priced estimate anonymously. (Dr. Drang is a pseudonym, however I do not consider him confidential.)

Previous studies were reported for 2015, 2016, 2017, and also 2018.

[If you appreciate articles like this one, support us by becoming a Six Colors subscriber. Subscribers get access to an exclusive newsletter, podcast, and community.]